|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
09/12/2006, 01:50 am
With the DOUBLE posture of the British/USA English speakers, the FIRST posture (of cp on the vocal CORDS, slanted backwards/below, and bp on the lowest neck/throat) articulates all the words in the tail of [+]; that is, in the style of [+bend], [+extraordinary], [+ventriloquism], etc. and automatically (that is, irregardless of speaker’s will) decide which vowels be accented primarily/secondarily and accordingly the in-word intonation/rhythm, with the special exceptions/cases of such words as “object, arithmetic, etc.” which are differently accented according to whether noun or verb/adjective and spoken as noun when cp is more weighted and as verb or adjective when bp is more weighted, or of such words as “extraordinary” which are differently (secondarily-) accented according to where cp is (high/low). And the SECOND (articulating) posture of (British) cp in the nasal cavity and bp high/front in the mouth, (LA/USA) cp/high and bp/front in the mouth, or (NY/USA) cp/low and bp/front in the mouth, etc. for examples, decides which phonemes will be directly employed/vectored/articulated without the procedure of digraph.
Eventually, the DOUBLE posture of the British/USA English speakers show/speak the phonemes of one of the second postures, with any types of [+bend], [b+end], and [be+nd] according to the speaker characteristics, and the in-word intonation/rhythm of the FIRST posture to decide which vowels be accented primarily/secondarily.
So, even though the English speaker deliberately/inadvertently or by mistake (tries to) primarily-accent one of other vowels of [e, a, i] than [o] for “extraordinary” while once taking the posture of cp on the vocal CORDS, slanted backwards/below, and bp on the lowest neck/throat, or the DOUBLE posture, of the FIRST posture of cp on the vocal CORDS, slanted backwards/below, and bp on the lowest neck/throat, and the second postures of (British) cp in the nasal cavity and bp high/front in the mouth, (LA/USA) cp/high and bp/front in the mouth, or (NY/USA) cp/low and bp/front in the mouth, etc. for examples; [o] is automatically primarily-accented irregardless of the speaker’s will/inadvertency/mistake or whatever. And even though the speaker deliberately/inadvertently or by mistake (tries to) primarily-accent one of other vowels than [i] of “-ril-” for “ventriloquism”, [i] of “-ril-” is automatically primarily-accented irregardless of the speaker’s will/inadvertency/mistake or whatever. So, English (in-word) accent/intonation/rhythm is decided/made automatically/unconsciously in origin, not by human will/effort/knowledge/practice/etc.
|
  |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send mail
Name Search
Won’t, don’t, can’t, haven’t, we’re, we’ll, I’ve, etc.
an; [∂n]/[æn] or [Λŋ]/[æŋ]? etc.
