|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
>> What kind of response are you expecting? Who do you think "upenn phonetics/phonology" is? Do you really think it's one person? Or even a group of people who are all doing identical research? If so, you are extremely ignorant.
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Summer_2004/ling001/lecture2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonetics
* I think that the contents of the above sites are (totally) wrong and useless at all. And some (professors) of UPenn (and many universities/organizations/etc. in the world) even advertise it, which I can not permit. And I need witness, for which language-related people (group) I think are appropriate.
>> If you really want a "response", why don't you research about what kind of research the individuals are doing at UPenn, and write to them individually. Right now you are spamming the UPenn linguistics community and writing to a bunch of people who have no interest in the kind of research you claim to be doing.
* I need witness. Those people (professors) who even advertise it are very shamefully/contemptibly deceitful/dishonest. And how can they be honest? UPenn society should stop their advertisement/job and investigate whether their theories are right/useful or not.
>> Better yet, why don't you provide links to your peer-reviewed journal articles so we can evaluate your research more completely and begin a proper discussion, instead of your silliness with "challenging upenn phonetics/phonology", which is a meaningless idea.
* Those Korean people of phonetics/phonology who have bought my book and read my articles are silent, which means they agree to/with my writings, I think.
>> And stop emailing such a large group of people. Everyone thinks you are just a spammer.
* Now, I will soon challenge UCLA in the same way for witness.
|

 |

58.143.155.202 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

|
|
|
|
| | |
| | |
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|