|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
----- Original Message -----
From: ygwnkm
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:53 PM
Subject: Speech Prosody
Dear *************:
> - the next step would be to try to publish something in a peer-reviewed journal of conference.
* But I have informed the linguists/phoneticians (group) of my homepage with writings, which are free/easy and real-time immediate for review/etc.
> Contrary to what you affirm many linguists and phoneticians are always looking for new ideas - for me that is one of the principle interests of attending conferences.
* I do not deny any conference effects, though conferences can be expensive/tiresome in time/place/travel/etc., compared with internet conference/forum/etc. If we have preliminary/preparatory communications/forums through internet before conferences, the conferences themselves can be business settlement/agreement/contract/conclusion/etc. I agree you are progressive and always looking for new ideas. But I have found most linguists and phoneticians (including many people of humanities) except few are very conservative/defensive, irresponsible (to world/future) escapists, afraid of any new ideas/fact/ventures. (My writing/research/discoveries show) Phonetics is very important and closely connected to/with linguistics general (of most languages, morphology, syntax, phonology, orthography, semantics, pragmatics, etc.) and phoneticians must do something contributive to linguistics general and the humankind, which job/projects are too big/enormous for me alone to do, even though I hope me alone to be excellent in the world. Most engineers and developers are aggressive and even willingly steal new ideas of other people/products, far from being defensive/conservative.
> Unfortunately I have spend far more than ten minutes looking at your writings and nothing that I could see there has the slightest resemblance to a scientific claim of any sort - sorry maybe it's
just your bad English but I really couldn't see anything original or new which actually makes any factual claims. I'm afraid the impression your writings give me is one of fairly acute paranoia.
* My board statistics (if correct) always shows more than (at least) 2000 ~ 3000 visits every week (since February), 2/3 of which is from U.S.A., who will not visit any (paranoia-like) home pages of no value repeatedly. “Far more than ten minutes” will not be sufficient to decide whether it is one of fairly acute paranoia or not. Who ever will think you resemble a scientific or reasonable man when you have spend far more than TEN minutes looking at world/history-new research/discovery/writings of big quantity while you always say “attending of conferences” or the likes??
best wishes,
Young-Won Kim
 ygwnkm@yahoo.co.kr , ygwnkm@hotmail.com ,
 http://voicespec.com/board.cgi?id=test1
http://voicespec.com/
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: "ygwnkm" < ygwnkm@yahoo.co.kr>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: root of (all) grammar(s); phonetics
Dear Young-Won Kim
Congratulations on making your writings available to linguists and phoneticians - that is a good step - the next step would be to try to publish something in a peer-reviewed journal of conference. Contrary to what you affirm many linguists and phoneticians are always looking for new ideas - for me that is one of the principle interests of attending conferences.
Unfortuantely I have spend far more than ten minutes looking at your writings and nothing that I could see there has the slightest ressemblance to a scientific claim of any sort - sorry maybe it's just your bad English but I really couldn't see anything original or new which actually makes any factual claims. I'm afraid the impression your writings give me is one of fairly acute paranoia.
best wishes
***********
|
  |
61.102.137.75 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
|
|
|
|
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name Search
Australia. Austria, Belgium, France, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore,
>> univ-tlse2.fr
